Model’s $4,000-a-Night Airbnb Photoshoot Sparks Eviction Drama in Curacao

11 July 2025

Jam Press/@nylacaselli

In the opulent surroundings of a $4,000‑a‑night beachfront villa in Curaçao, model and OnlyFans personality Nyla Caselli embarked on what she called a “creative content shoot” only to be abruptly evicted after the host discovered images she deemed inappropriate and suggestive being captured on the property. The clash between Caselli’s artistic intentions and the property owner's expectations quickly escalated, igniting debates about boundaries in luxury rentals.

Caselli, 23, had booked the villa as part of a lavish escape, drawn to the allure of crystal waters and pristine white sands that served as a backdrop for her professional work. As a content creator whose visual brand blends fashion, lifestyle, and sensuality, she saw the villa as a canvas for bold imagery. Armed with an assistant, props, and no disclosure to the host, she began shooting lingerie and swimwear content on the terrace and near the pool sites she believed complemented her creative vision.

The villa was advertised to guests as a peaceful sanctuary; no mention was made of it being available for photo shoots or commercial production. That distinction proved to be the crux of the conflict. The host, who had agreed to Caselli’s stay under standard Airbnb terms, made a surprise visit to the property after noticing her bright editorial activity. Upon seeing the content direction she’d taken, he immediately expressed disapproval and insisted the property be vacated.

Witnesses report a tense encounter outside the villa in which the host cited his agreement had forbade professional photography or shoots aimed at attracting public attention. Feeling blindsided, Caselli found herself packing under pressure, her creative project halted and the dream retreat in danger of becoming a public relations nightmare.

Sources told the Post that the host has since moved to notify Airbnb of the incident, warning that violations of policy regarding appropriate behavior and unauthorized photo shoots could lead to Caselli’s account being banned. The rules governing guest conduct clearly state that commercial projects require prior approval, a detail Caselli chose not to disclose, likely assuming that her brand work fell under creative freedom rather than commercial intent.

Caselli unfolded the incident on social media, describing it as a shocking violation of privacy and artistic intent. She voiced her disappointment that the host reacted so strongly, given the villa’s picturesque and open design. She emphasized that no nudity occurred and that the images were tasteful, modeling rather than explicit. To her, the rental promised aesthetic opportunity, not a restriction on personal creative expression.

Despite Caselli’s explanation, observers have pointed out that property owners are within their rights to object when usage veers into a quasi-commercial domain. Homeowners rely on agreed terms to manage liability and control how their property is represented publicly especially when payments reach into the thousands per night. A clash between expectations was inevitable.

Airbnb policy clarifies that creative or commercial projects particularly those intended for public platforms trigger a requirement for host approval. The incident raises questions about transparency and whether users should anticipate how their content plans might be perceived. Many traveling creators now negotiate content clauses or “shoot permits” into their bookings to avoid misunderstandings.

This eviction comes amid wider dialogue on the balance between the creator economy and respect for private spaces. From model shoots to wedding videos, hosts and creators must wink to the same understanding: when shelter becomes stage, boundaries matter. Luxury rentals are marketed for indulgence, but fashion photography and influencer shoots transform them into visual sets and that reality can land guests in hot water.

In the wake of Caselli’s ordeal, both hosts and content creators are reportedly rethinking how they navigate the Airbnb ecosystem. Some have begun including clear language in listings “no editorial shoots without permission” while others advise creators to reach out ahead of booking. Similarly, those seeking scenic locations for paid campaigns are now sourcing alternative platforms built to accommodate projects.

Caselli’s story has ignited social media discussion: fans and critics debating whether her removal was an overstep or a justified protection of private property rights. Some comment threads explore the responsibility underpayment of premium rentals should entail, while others empathize with how quickly artistic freedom can be curtailed in a shared marketplace.

Behind the sensational headlines lies a sobering lesson about the evolving world of short-term rentals: no matter how glamorous or lucrative a stay may appear, rental agreements set the perimeter for what can and cannot happen. In the delicate dance between art and ownership, Airbnb’s terms offer structure, but mutual respect remains the unwritten rule.

For Nyla Caselli, the fallout may inform her future booking strategy. She’s reportedly reviewing cancellation and move-in insurance clauses so that her next shoot can proceed without controversy or eviction. For hosts, the episode serves as a reminder to clarify listings and expectations before pocketing large nightly sums.

In a digital age where every space can be staged and shared, Caselli’s Curaçao eviction feels less like celebrity spectacle and more like a cultural bellwether. It illustrates exactly how fast creative expression can collide with ownership rights when no one reads the fine print. It’s a cautionary tale wrapped in tropical daylight, a vivid moment that reminds us even paradise stays operate under rules.